Wearing My Editing Hat

I’ve been spending a lot of time editing lately (don’t worry, I’m still writing, although not as much as I’d like). Most of this work has been coming from a particular Haredi publisher — it’s fun, it’s challenging, and I’m learning a lot. I started off doing copyediting, but periodically, the acquisitions editor asks me to handle a developmental editing project.

If you follow me on Twitter, you might have seen a few threads about what I’ve been dealing with in the manuscripts I’ve been handling. For example, I sent some R & R (revise and resubmit) notes to a writer about her first 30 pages, then offered a thread about characterization in the first 30 pages of your novel. In other tweets, I touched on words to eliminate when you revise your book and how to format your submissions. (Following me on Twitter is the best way to keep up with my professional endeavors, in case you haven’t figured that out yet.)

Anyway, a lot of the Haredi men and women who submit to the publisher I’ve been working with (it’s still freelance, and it’s very part-time) don’t use Twitter. Nor do many of the fledgling writers who may soon be submitting their first manuscript to a publisher. It doesn’t occur to them to look for writing tips on YouTube or on social media, and they may not have access to secular books about writing (I’m working on a Jewish one…but who knows when I’ll finish and whether it will be published). They might not have taken any classes or webinars on writing, nor have most of these writers participated in a writing group.

The upshot is that there are a lot of submissions which contain fantastic ideas in packages which are highly unprofessional.

You wouldn’t want your submission to be rejected because it was formatted incorrectly, do you?

This post is the one post that I want printed out. I want English teachers in Jewish schools to print it out (with attribution indicating it’s written by me) and then circulate it among their 12th graders. I want people who have friends or relatives who are planning to submit their first story to a publisher to print it and hand it to them. I want this because I WANT THEIR BOOKS TO BE AS READY FOR PUBLICATION AS POSSIBLE.

HOW TO FORMAT YOUR MANUSCRIPT LIKE A PROFESSIONAL

1) Only one space should follow your end punctuation. Once upon a time, you might have heard it’s best to skip two. However, it’s no longer industry standard to skip two spaces after end punctuation except in a few niches (including academic journals & legal writing).

2) Do not hit the space bar to indent. You should also not hit Tab to indent. Instead, use the Ruler Bar on your word processing program. Slide the TOP arrow only. 5-space indentation used to be common; most places use 3-space currently. Choose one of those sizes of indentation.

Now, every time you hit Enter, your next paragraph will indent.

3) Another common error: using both indentation AND skipping a line between paragraphs. Again, there are exceptions for some academic journals and in legal writing, but in general, you choose EITHER to indent OR to skip lines between paragraphs.

Please do not hit Enter an extra time to skip a line between paragraphs. Your copyeditor will have to go back and delete every one of those Enters. In order to set skip lines between paragraphs (or to take them away), make sure you have visited the Paragraph Menu (under Home for Word) but nested on the main Tool Bar for Google Docs (click the three dots on the Tool Bar for that option to come up).

If you are setting up a new scene, and that’s why you are skipping a line, put a pound-sign (#) or an asterisk (*) on that line.

4) If you want to start at the top of a new page, don’t just hit Enter till you reach the new page. Insert a Page Break instead.

5) Most publishers prefer a 12-point font, though most word processing programs have an 11-point default now. Make sure you’ve switched 12-point!

6) Don’t use fancy fonts. Simple serif fonts are best: Times New Roman, Cambria, Georgia, Garamond. You can use a simple sans serif font for titles such as Arial or Calibri.

7) Don’t right justify. It makes it too hard to tell whether spacing is correct.

8) Please double space.

9) Using the Footer Menu (nested in the Format or Insert Menu depending on your program), insert your name, either a phone number or email address, and then — using the Page Number Tool — the page number.

10) Head the first page with your name, the title of your book, your address, your phone number, and an email address (assuming you have one).

10 THINGS TO CHECK BEFORE YOU SUBMIT A NARRATIVE (A NOVEL OR MEMOIR):

  1. Did you identify the main character within the first page? (If you start with a prologue that doesn’t show the main character, it must be less than two pages long and should show us something about the problem and the stakes. A prologue always serves plot or characterization.)
  2. Did you start the book in the right place? This is usually at the “inciting incident.” That’s the event or decision which sets the story in motion. (Examples: In Henye Meyer’s THIS IS AMERICA!, the book starts with Tcherna’s desire to marry & money set aside for that purpose. When a sudden need arises for the men in the family to flee to America, the money is repurposed and Tcherna’s longing for a husband is thwarted. In Jane Austen’s PRIDE AND PREJUDICE, the novel starts with the arrival of a new neighbor and the main character’s mother announcing her intent to marry one of her daughters off to him.)
  3. On the first page, is there a source of obvious conflict?
  4. Does every scene serve the plot and theme or show us important details about the main character? Does each scene lead logically to the next one, and do they move towards a climax and resolution?
  5. Have you gotten feedback from someone who is in your target audience, who regularly reads this type of book, and who is not related to you (nor are they a close friend)? YOU NEED ACQUIRE FEEDBACK AND THEN TO REVISE.
  6. Did you use spellcheck and grammar check?
  7. Did you make sure that any transliterated words are spelled consistently — for example, you used “challah” every time, not “challah” and “khale” and “challoh” and “challa?”
  8. Did you cut as many instances as possible of the following words: just, even, still, begins to, starts to, trying to, & very?
  9. When the reader finishes your story, do they understand the message you intended?
  10. Have you checked all scientific, medical, and historical details for accuracy?

Again, PLEASE PRINT THIS WITH MY NAME (REBECCA KLEMPNER) ON IT AND THEN SHARE, SHARE, SHARE!

A Copyeditor’s Rant

During my disappearance from this blog, I spent a lot of my time proofreading, editing, and copyediting.

First, while people tend to use the terms interchangeably:

  • A proofreader checks text for syntax, spelling, punctuation, and other similar errors and corrects them.
  • An editor may do the above, but also will consider the content of the piece, the order of sentences, meaning, style, how the author addresses the audience, and other, deeper issues.
  • A copyeditor deals with text intended for publication – for instance, in a magazine or a book, proofreads it, checks it for accuracy (for instance, are the names of sources spelled correctly?), and then formats the material according to the “house style” of the publisher.

As you can see, each job has slightly different responsibilities. Mostly, I’ve been copyediting the local publication I mentioned in earlier blog posts. In general, I love the job. The hours are flexible (so I’m free to take care of sick kids or errands), and I get to make other writers look good. I’ve developed great working relationships with several of the columnists, thank G-d.

But there are also annoyances. And – without naming names – I’m going to tell you about some of them, because many of the people who read this blog are also writers, and those who aren’t may still be in a position where they have to write something for public consumption. A little awareness about common issues might prove helpful to you.

Continue reading

Writing a serial: Nickel and dime-ing your way through fiction publishing

On the way to pick up one of my kids at school on Friday afternoon, one of the other moms pulled me aside.

“We’re really enjoying your new serial in Binah,” she said.

I got a little extra bounce in my step. “Thanks!”

“But getting just one chapter a week is driving us crazy! It’s so hard to wait for the next one!’ she added.

“Sorry!” I replied.

There really isn’t anything I can do to help her, but I feel her pain. Usually, I’m the reader throwing my arms up in frustration at the end of a serial episode screaming, “I have to know what happens next! Argh!”

What’s really funny, is that now as a writer, Continue reading

My latest obsession: comparing the numbers of comments to the numbers of “likes”

Okay, I’ll admit it: there are better ways to spend my time. But for some reason, I have recently become obsessed with the following question:

Why do some articles get many “likes,” but few comments, and some articles get many comments, but few “likes?”

Until recently, I never paid attention to the social network shares on my articles. I paid attention to the comments so I could monitor and respond to them, but I didn’t watch how many people “liked” my article, tweeted about it, or whatever. I guess something happened when I finally joined FB myself.

First, I found myself comparing the rates of “likes” vs. comments on my Tablet articles, then I noticed the same discrepancies on other people’s articles.

I get that it’s easier to “like” than to write a whole comment. I do. Also, “likes” get shared with other people readers think will enjoy or appreciate the article. And that explains why some articles (the most recent one I wrote, for example) have a “likes” to comment ratio that far favors the “likes.”

Do more comments than “likes” signal dislike?

 

What I don’t get are the stories that move in the opposite direction (including one of my other articles). What makes someone comment, but not “like”? Because they’re mad at me? Because something I said incensed them? Is that it?

Do you have any insight on this issue (as a reader, writer, marketer, or publisher)? Please share it in the comments below.

In the Courtyard of the Novelist: An interview with Ruchama King Feuerman

I’ve got a treat here today: an interview (conducted via email) with award-winning author, Ruchama King Feuerman. Her latest book, In the Courtyard of the Kabbalist, just came out in September as an ebook. Recently, she signed a contract to expand the release to paperback. I became acquainted with Ruchama through Tablet Magazine online, where both of us have published essays. She was gracious enough to send me a copy of her new book and even more gracious to answer a few questions the novel left me with.

R.K. – In your first book, Seven Blessings, the central figure is a very strong female character. In this new book, you primarily follow two male, unmarried characters. What was that like for you as a married woman?

new book from Ruchama King Feuerman

In the Courtyard of the Kabbalist, now out from NYRB LIT

R.K.F.I prefer writing from the male point of view. This way I don’t worry about slippage, about parts of  my personality leaking into my characters, it’s just cleaner — what’s me is me, and what’s them is them.  I feel much freer to invent and have fun when I write as a man.  I do tend to prefer singles maybe because they are inherently dramatic. Continue reading

The Rejection Letter that’s Good for You

Yesterday, I got a rejection letter.

Yes, it happens a lot.

I’ve argued in the past that rejection letters are good for you, and I’ve gotten better at taking them in stride, but this one went even further. Its timing couldn’t have been more perfect.

You see, last night was my monthly writers’ workshop. All morning, I’d been trying to decide on a piece to bring and share. When that rejection letter appeared in my inbox around noon, I decided it was a sign.

No, not that kind of sign.

Not just a sign, but a Sign — “This is the piece you should bring to your writers’ workshop tonight.”

So, I did.

And it was magical.

Our group was smaller than usual, consisting of just three of us (usually, we’re four or five). But the two other ladies present gave me so much insight about what worked in my story and what did not, feedback that I might have been less open to, had I not just received the rejection letter. I spent a good chunk of this morning working on revisions, and plan to wrap them up tomorrow in between baking my challah and roasting my chicken.

I’m still hoping that the next time I hear from an editor, they send an acceptance letter. (To say that I pray for acceptance letters is no exaggeration.) But this experience is definitely going to help me embrace the next rejection letter.

Because another will surely come.